Lyza Danger Gardner

All about Lyza


Category: ‘Books’

Book Review: “Angela’s Ashes” by Frank McCourt

Tuesday, May 6th, 2008

I wasn’t completely swept off my feet by this much-loved Irish autobiography, but I had an enjoyable engagement with it. McCourt’s grim take on his childhood poverty in Depression- and WWII-era Limerick is simultaneously depressing and bemusing.

Characters are fairly allegorical, though not without surprising complexity. Priests are inflexible, laughable and contradictory–though not all of them. Extended family members are condescending, bigoted and hypocritical–but not all of them, and not all of the time.

A few gems stand out: the janitor at the hospital where McCourt endures typhoid; a shut-in who has been shattered by his experiences in the English army in India; a forgiving and patient Franciscan priest.

The constant hard knocks. Repetitive, rhythmic sorrows of death and poverty and alcoholism. You see them coming up on the story’s horizon and you’re powerless to defuse them. It’s hard at times, to read. His father’s drinking is especially hard to tolerate because it’s such a helpless situation.

Everything is painted so grey: the lane, the dingy, flooded house, the River Shannon. So when something happens driven from love, the color it shoots into the story is blinding. Guilt and perseverance bind families and neighborhoods together. It is a nice frame of reference through which to grasp a basic understanding of the era.

I went in prepared for something that was aimed at the heartstrings. Perhaps as a result of this steely preparation, my tears were not jerked. But I was touched, if not moved. ( )

Book #21 of 2008 for me!

Book Review: “Sarah’s Key” by Tatiana de Rosnay

Saturday, May 3rd, 2008

I received another Early Reviewer book this month from LibraryThing. The paperback edition of Sarah’s Key will come out this fall. It is currently available in hardback from Amazon and other sources.

In 1942, thousands of Jewish children, women, and men were herded into a stadium in Paris–the Vel’d'Hiv’–and summarily shipped off to concentration camps, mostly to their immediate deaths. That this roundup was executed by the French police (not the Nazis) and that it was mostly expurgated from the mainstream of French history darkens an already dark chapter. “Sarah’s Key” follows the fictional story of one young victim, a 10-year-old girl, and a modern woman whose life whose life intersects with hers in mysterious ways.

The story is part mass market thriller, part didactic history lesson, and part novel, a well-crafted but poorly-written page-turner more akin to an action movie than a work of literary subtlety.

It was about a third of the way into “Sarah’s Key” that I started wondering if it had been originally written in English (t was). I scoured the title pages for translator credits; I surfed the Web for data. The author, Tatiana de Rosnay, is French, so it would be feasible that that language is where this began. I did this research because I was hoping that there was a reason that the language was as dreadful as it was. I wanted to be able to blame someone other than the author for the stock, jarring phrases like “eyes white with fear” and “speechless with terror.” At one point, speaking of a matter of life and death amongst the characters, de Rosnay has the young girl worry franctically if, by locking her very young brother in a hidden cabinet when the police come to round up her family, she has “let him down.”

Let him down? “I let him down” is a reasonable thing to say when you miss your kid get a home run in his tee-ball game because you’re working late at the office. It seems a wildly inappropriate (not to mention anachronistic) way to describe a child’s potential death. Perhaps this was on purpose. But it smacked of a carelessness with words that I found difficult to ignore.

The effort the book makes at bringing an obfuscated, shameful piece of history to the fore is noble. de Rosnay is right, most people have not heard of this tragedy. But what’s missing, except for brief mention, is the broader context of the French Occupation and the Vichy regime. France’s political paroxysms during WWII are complex, and I’m not going to pretend I understand them (yet). I would have appreciated a lesson in how the Vel d’Hiv’ tragedy plugged in to what was going on in a broader sense. de Rosnay condemns the French policemen for carrying out the grim task, and though she does have a character that breaks out his jackboot role, the rest of the force is portrayed as thugs blindly following orders. One has to question what the motivation was, what was really driving it.

What I can credit the work with is its inventiveness of plot. I hesitate to pigeonhole something about the Holocaust as a “beach read” but it has that tempo, a Dan Brown-ish Byzantine intrigue, that seems to suggest the genre. At an early point in the story, I paused and made specific predictions about the resolution of the story arcs. I was wrong about nearly all of them, which was redeeming.

During my brief Web research about the book, I came across the publisher’s page, trumpeting that movie rights have been sold. Good, I thought. Perfect. Because this is an isolated case in which I think the movie might be better than the book. ( )

Finally, an Internet Meme with my Name all over it

Wednesday, April 30th, 2008

Some folks have been digging through LibraryThing books, looking at books that most often get tagged “unread,” indicating, duh, that they haven’t been read. Sadly, my system of tagging uses “TBR” (to be read) instead of “unread”, so my tags aren’t included in this collection. The top 106 most unread books are the meme. Why 106? Don’t ask me.

It is much in the spirit of other Internet memes in that it lets you talk about yourself a lot.

Here’s the premise: you take the list and then indicate:

  1. Books you’ve read
  2. Books you started but didn’t finish
  3. Books that are on your to-read list
  4. Books that you downright hated!

I’m going to do it this way:

  1. Books I’ve read
  2. Books I started but failed at
  3. Books that are on my to-read list. If I own it already, it won’t be italicized. If I intend to read it Real Soon Now, it’s bold.
  4. Books that I have no particular intention of reading, at this time
  5. Books that I didn’t like!

Here we Go!

  1. Jonathan Strange & M. Norrell
  2. Anna Karenina
  3. Crime and Punishment
  4. Catch-22
  5. One hundred years of solitude
  6. Wuthering Heights
  7. The Silmarillion
  8. Life of Pi: a novel
  9. The Name of the Rose
  10. Don Quixote
  11. Moby Dick
  12. Ulysses
  13. Madame Bovary
  14. The Odyssey
  15. Pride and Prejudice
  16. Jane Eyre
  17. A Tale of Two Cities
  18. The Brothers Karamazov
  19. Guns, Germs, and Steel: the fates of human societies
  20. War and Peace
  21. Vanity Fair
  22. The Time Traveller’s Wife
  23. The Iliad
  24. Emma
  25. The Blind Assassin
  26. The Kite Runner
  27. Mrs. Dalloway
  28. Great Expectations
  29. American Gods
  30. A heartbreaking work of staggering genius (This is my least favorite book ever)
  31. Atlas shrugged
  32. Reading Lolita in Tehran
  33. Memoirs of a Geisha
  34. Middlesex
  35. Quicksilver
  36. Wicked : the life and times of the wicked witch of the West
  37. The Canterbury tales
  38. The Historian
  39. A portrait of the artist as a young man
  40. Love in the time of cholera
  41. Brave new world
  42. The Fountainhead
  43. Foucault’s Pendulum
  44. Middlemarch
  45. Frankenstein
  46. The Count of Monte Cristo
  47. Dracula
  48. A clockwork orange
  49. Anansi Boys
  50. The Once and Future King
  51. The Grapes of Wrath
  52. The Poisonwood Bible
  53. 1984
  54. Angels & Demons
  55. The Inferno
  56. The Satanic Verses
  57. Sense and sensibility
  58. The Picture of Dorian Gray
  59. Mansfield Park
  60. One flew over the cuckoo’s nest
  61. To the Lighthouse
  62. Tess of the D’Urbervilles
  63. Oliver Twist
  64. Gulliver’s Travels
  65. Les misérables
  66. The Corrections
  67. The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier and Clay
  68. The curious incident of the dog in the night-time
  69. Dune
  70. The Prince
  71. The Sound and the Fury
  72. Angela’s Ashes (I am reading this RIGHT NOW!)
  73. The God of Small Things
  74. A people’s history of the United States : 1492-present
  75. Cryptonomicon
  76. Neverwhere
  77. A confederacy of dunces
  78. A Short History of Nearly Everything
  79. Dubliners
  80. The unbearable lightness of being
  81. Beloved
  82. Slaughterhouse-five
  83. The Scarlet Letter
  84. Eats, Shoots & Leaves
  85. The mists of Avalon
  86. Oryx and Crake : a novel
  87. Collapse : how societies choose to fail or succeed
  88. Cloud Atlas
  89. The Confusion
  90. Lolita
  91. Persuasion
  92. Northanger Abbey
  93. The Catcher in the Rye
  94. On the Road
  95. The Hunchback of Notre Dame
  96. Freakonomics
  97. Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance
  98. The Aeneid
  99. Watership Down
  100. Gravity’s Rainbow
  101. The Hobbit
  102. In Cold Blood
  103. White teeth (This is the only book on the list I’m not familiar with)
  104. Treasure Island
  105. David Copperfield
  106. The Three Musketeers

Thanks for putting up with me! I’ve read nearly half of them. Whew!

Book Review: “So Brave, Young and Handsome” by Leif Enger

Wednesday, April 30th, 2008

Enger’s second novel gracefully tells a very American tale of identify and redemption, uncoiling with an almost Homeric, profound cadence, but in the end telling us less than I’d like. Sometimes what you look for in a book are the slight edges of imperfection. Sometimes when reading something classic, something fully planed flat and careful, we lose our way and are unable to feel enough. Perhaps that’s what happened to me here. No little burrs of emotion snagged into my soul.

It’s 1915. Monte Becket, a flailing, possibly dilettante writer with a rather too-lovely, whipsmart little family up in Minnesota (and obvious latent wanderlust), decides to tail along with Glendon, a fugitive felon whose crimes include…well, pretty much everything. But Glendon is good at making boats. And drinking.

What follows is an adventure tale that has that heavy, attractive feel of that underpinning of adventure stories that has been with us since prehistory. And it echoes the masters who have wielded the brush of this kind of adventure. Sections of river travel smack of Mark Twain. High plains and western happenings have shadows of (softer) Cormac McCarthy, Kent Haruf, Ivan Doig. Even the occasional burp of Steinbeck, especially towards the end of the novel.

Parts are downright appealing. The river-floating and turtle-catching center of the country now lost to modernity. Cowboys with depravities. Floods and shooting. It is a fun read, full of crisp and hearty language.

Characters speak in off-the-cuff, just-then-coined, beautiful proverbs. The countryside is dashed off in a few words or sentences that leave no doubt, and leave the reader room to roam the textures of the characters and the plots.

But some things–the bigger pieces–don’t deliver fully. There’s a pattering, heavily thumping sub-current of redemption. Glendon’s nearsightedness and other characters’ various types of blindness are emphasized. Without giving away plot points, I can say that the way these themes are handled and wrapped up left me cold. I found it hard to reconcile the motives of Becket in a few places, about two-thirds through the book–he left me exasperated. Additionally, the excitement and clarity of the structure and language in the book leave one expecting a swelling, memorable resolution and instead I feel blank.

But! I think someone of different temperament, at a different emotional point than I am right at the moment, might find this book deeply moving. I can imagine it filling a particular shape of personal void. And, for Enger’s admitted firm grasp on the language, and the enjoyability of the story, it still gets high marks. (

Book Review: “The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin”

Wednesday, April 30th, 2008

Required reading, I suppose, for those of us trying to grasp the mindset of the founders of the United States. Franklin’s free-wheeling book flits from topic to topic, now an account of his early apprentice printing days, now a lengthy diatribe on the back-and-forth of a particular political struggle. Peppered with anecdotes, proverbs and false modesty.

I find Franklin fascinating. I at once want to be exactly like him and nothing like him. He’s a conundrum, at once piercingly moral and yet full of falsity and selfishness. He’s brilliant and driven and gets things done, but he glosses over his own shortcomings (while insidiously painting a picture of complete honesty and introspection). Franklin is a character too complex to have ever been invented–he is a confounding reality, too big for fiction.

Franklin was in many ways a progressive. He cites the importance of education for women (albeit with the goal of filling in gaps whilst husbands or sons are incapacitated) and religious tolerance and diversity (”…even if the Mufti of Constantinople were to send a missionary to preach Mohammedanism to us, he would find a pulpit at his service”), yet he labels Native Americans as “savages”, bent on simplistic overindulgence and wanton slaughter, following the traditional parlance and bigotry of the time.

My rating reflects not the historical worth of this document but my fulfillment and enjoyment upon reading it. The lengthy passages about Franklin’s struggles in political office and the debating of bills and whatnot in Assemblies bored the pants off of me–it’s simply not in any category that interests me. Those more driven by political science and government structure would likely rate the whole work higher. ( )