Lyza Danger Gardner

All about Lyza


Category: ‘PDX’

Vintage Footage of Portland Traffic

March 17th, 2008

I’ve seen bazillions of old photos of Portland, especially on my photo trips to the Oregon Historical Society’s research library. What I haven’t seen before is footage like this, traffic surveys from 1939 that show familiar intersections with vintage cars ‘n folks. I find it fascinating, even though nothing happens.

Via Cafe Unknown.

6th & Washington

6th & Alder, with scary bicylce moment

12th & Burnside (E), still a messed up intersection–in color! 1939!

6th & Morrison, also in color

Tags: , , , ,

3 Responses to “Vintage Footage of Portland Traffic”

  1. tODD Says:

    Wow, downtown was hopping with pedestrians! Also: left turns were chock full of danger back then. Or at least appear so to this denizen of the 21st century.

  2. Don Park Says:

    fascinating footage! the lane dividers are solid lines. the electric trolley car is a nice reminder of what was and whats possible. there is so much car traffic! i guess 1939 is too late to see people on horseback.

  3. sharon Says:

    Holy crap that is SO AWESOME!

    I’m forwarding on to all of my Portland history geek friends (and there are a lot of us.)

    I once found a 1950’s 20 minute video from the city of Portland about local bomb shelters and what to do in case of an attack….

    Not nearly as cool as those vids tho! So oooold.
    Thanks!

Leave a Reply

Coffee People Enclave

March 7th, 2008

For PDX-ers still mourning the loss of local coffee chain Coffee People (summarily bought out of existence by Starbucks, who coveted their two drive-in locations on MLK Blvd.) might feel a little bit better knowing that there is somewhere that is still carrying the flame.

There is a shop on SE Grand Ave and approximately Oak Street (quite near Nicholas, the Miller Paint Store and Andy and Bax) called something like “Coffee Shop People” (it’s kind of hard to parse) . They serve Black Tiger and Velvet Hammer espresso drinks and milkshakes. Granted the coffee itself is Dietrich, but that’s as close as you’re going to get. Perhaps my Google fu is weak but they don’t seem to have a Web presence whatsoever, even on GMaps. I didn’t actually get a milkshake today (they’re $4.55 for a “small” and I’d just had a stuffingly yum Nicholas mezza), but I’m very glad to know they’re there.

Girl behind the counter says they’re all authentic Coffee People recipes. Anyone seen this place or tried their clones?

Also, RIP Torrefazione. You were too good for S’bucks, too.

Tags:

3 Responses to “Coffee People Enclave”

  1. » Silicon Florist’s links arrangement for March 8, 2008 - Silicon Florist Says:

    [...] Lyza Danger Gardner: Coffee People Enclave [...]

  2. Jeff the Great Says:

    Coffee People was purchased by Starbucks in 2006 (from Diedrich). Deidrich was to retain some trademarks, brand names, and even a few locations.

  3. Momula Says:

    The owners of Coffee People had another little place up on Fremont for a while, but it’s since closed.

    My latest coffee love is Legar’s at 15th (or maybe 14th) and Clinton. It bills itself not as a coffee house but as a community resource center. The house coffee is excellent, and they will make you a custom cup from any of several special beans or blends listed on their menu. Occasionally there are a few loaves of bread on the counter by the door. It’s free; just tear off a piece. Many pastries from Le Petit Provence and various Vietnamese bakeries.

Leave a Reply

Mobile The Heck out of it

February 14th, 2008

Like Portland? Like mobile stuff? Like tech and Web stuff? Then get mobilated. Cell-webbed. Textoclicked.

Cloud Four (that’s my awesome company!) is helping to organize a new Mobile Portland group, where mobile people can get together and yak it up and make great leaps in ideas for mobility.

Keep an eye on Cloud Four’s blog for more information, or sign up at mobileportland.com.

See also coverage on Silicon Florist.

Tags: , , , ,

One Response to “Mobile The Heck out of it”

  1. Josh Pyles Says:

    Jason’s presentation was great last night!

    Congrats on the new group. Hope it takes off!

Leave a Reply

The “Partly” Part of Partly Sunny

February 13th, 2008

It’s the 13th! Know what that means? It means that, at least until I change the logic again, that it’s the day you’ll see a photograph of a rainbow in Finland (it was an epic rainbow, believe me) in the header of the site. I know most of you don’t actually visit the site itself, but you can trust me.

So in that vein, I’m going to talk about the weather.

My OS X weather widget shows a mostly sunny icon for today. Word on the street is that it’s supposed to be mild. But here it is 10:38 and the sky is crusted over and it’s only 40 degrees. This got me to thinking about weather, forecasting, and challenge that putting the two together causes for meteorologists in the Pacific Northwest. I gather the weather is hard to predict here.

If you prefer to receive your weather outlook as more of a fascinating, introspective musing (often with shades of grey) than a simple icon, and you live ’round here, I highly recommend Fox 12’s Weather Blog. I like how the jargon and the zeal show through in passages like this:

Models continue to show longwave ridging over the Northwest through at least the early part of the next week. This weekend looks especially nice with very high 500mb. heights and a sharp ridge.

I also like how the forecast is posited as a theory, not an inevitability. The blogging weathermen question themselves and their data in their posts. There’s lots of use of “maybe.” I like that. And there’s a heck of a lot of commenting by other people who also seem to have zeal.

Also interesting to me is ForecastAdvisor, which has apparently been around for some time. They collect forecasts from the major providers and analyze it for accuracy. Looks like forecasts for Portland are right about 3/4 of the time, which is more than I would have expected. And their icon for today shows rain (albeit I can’t figure out the source of their forecast from their FAQ–is it boiled down from all of the forecasts they process or their own data?)! Also noteworthy is that you can click on a day’s forecast and see past guesses for the same day leading up to the current outlook.

Other interesting weather sites or data I should know about?

Thanks to @donpdonp for the inspiration here.

Tags: ,

4 Responses to “The “Partly” Part of Partly Sunny”

  1. El Gray Says:

    I mostly just stick with http://www.noaa.gov for my forecast needs.
    My new phone also has a neat on-demand weather page that is usually up to date. It said tomorrow will be “refreshingly cool,” which made me laugh.

  2. Don Park Says:

    (im donpdonp)
    thats a lot of detail for a post about the weather. kudos.

    i go to noaa.gov and get the weather from the federal government. i figure every other weather organization is repackaging that information. Maybe there is some novel local climatology going on here in p-town.

  3. Alan I. Says:

    Ah the weather. I was so disappointed with the weather differential from downtown Sacramento to Folsom that I purchased my own Davis Vantage Pro 2 weather station and setup my own internet web site, http://www.folsomcaweather.com. I pump my weather data to weather underground, http://www.wunderground.com/, who offers a current weather google map mash-up (click on Google Maps of Weather Stations). This is how I know I compare with the rest of the area surrounding my neighborhood, city, and county.

    You should be able to get the same mash-up for the Portland area too. Plug-in your zip code and stand back!

  4. Chris Says:

    I recently saw http://www.cumul.us/. The site aggregates information from several resources. See the help page to understand how it works.

Leave a Reply

Yet Another Reason to Hate CitySearch

February 12th, 2008

Brewcaster over at Metroblogging Portland posted something about suckage at Los Baez Mexican restaurant, which is not far from my house, even so far as to give it a rating of EPIC FAIL.

I would argue, however, that the even bigger suckulus is Citysearch itself, to which the article linked. Look at this. Apparently Citysearch is unable to perform basic math and find the average of ratings. I could swear my friend Todd stumbled upon this before [Updated: it was my friend Kes*], but I can’t find it on his blog right now. I just find it kind of staggering. The correct “answer” is about 3.23 stars.

Citysearch FAIL
By the way, I hate Citysearch with that special disdain normally reserved for things like Microsoft and mislaid dog poo.

* So, sorry about the whole plagiarism thing, Kes.

Tags: , ,

7 Responses to “Yet Another Reason to Hate CitySearch”

  1. Jeff the Great Says:

    I’ve noticed the same thing over the years. I’ve even noticed that most businesses start out with 5 stars…..it’s like, how do they know!

    Also, would anyone be surprised if it were the paying customers of citysearch that magically have this “new math” going on?????

  2. Jeremy Says:

    So, gun to your head: Who do you marry?

    Citysearch or Pier One?

  3. tODD Says:

    To be fair (not that Citysearch deserves it — there is no love lost between us), the rating at the top is unlabeled, while the rating histogram at the bottom might be affiliated with the text “What Users are Saying”.

    Since Citysearch also has editorial reviews, I’d have to guess that there’s a (secret) editorial rating for the restaurant. Now, the editorial description for the restaurant is rather perfunctory, so perhaps an editor hasn’t actually visited the place. Given Citysearch’s need to not tick off the businesses it reviews and relies on for money (hello, conflict of interest), I’d bet that the default editorial rating is five stars. (This would also explain the rating of new businesses.)

    Which, if you do the math, means that reader reviews are probably worth 1/3 of the overall rating, and the editorial reviews 2/3. To be fair, I’m not sure how I’d deal with a flood of haters unfairly trying to take down a restaurant, so maybe that’s fair. But in this case, the overall rating is goofy.

  4. Sasha Says:

    To be fair, very few unweighted rating systems are fair. Haven’t you learned anything from WoW?

  5. ssm Says:

    Who uses citysearch– put your reviews on yelp. There’s a rating details link on each business page that shows the breakdown of ratings.
    http://www.yelp.com/biz/los-baez-mexican-restaurant-portland

  6. tODD Says:

    Unfortunately, Yelp’s 4-star rating for Los Baez really doesn’t say much in its defense as a restaurant-finding tool. But it is open, at least.

  7. Brett Says:

    Aww sad. Los Biez is from Salem, OR originally. Granted, it is in no way ‘authentic’, but they make good greasy platters of spanglish food. I have many fond memories of curing Saturday night hangovers there, on Sunday afternoon. The Portland restaurant has none of the charm or kitsch of the originals in Salem.

    That said, city search sucks, almost as much as evite.

Leave a Reply