Lyza Danger Gardner

All about Lyza


Category: ‘Rant’

On Crime

January 23rd, 2007

When visiting our previous house on Gantenbein, in N. Portland, a goodly percentage of visitors would remark upon our security or safety. There were lots of suggestions of us getting an alarm. There was lots of uncomfortable giggling about the drug deals going down in front of the house. Yet I never felt that my safety was in danger.

There’s a difference, you see, between the types of crimes I witnessed at my old place versus what has happened in the first few weeks of living in our austere Victorian giant in a very established neighborhood in SE Portland.

On Gantenbein, most crimes fell into two categories:
1) Directed. This especially applied to violent crimes. I was never concerned about getting shot, particularly, though shootings did happen in our neighborhood. Thing is, they weren’t random. The perps were aiming.
2) Crimes of extreme convenience. Yeah, if you left your $1000 bike on the sidewalk, it might disappear. Put the same bike behind a fence and it stays there. At least for us, for the time we were there. For example, I did have a keg stolen from the back of my house, where it sat, visible from the street, after a party. But we also had a Schwinn in our backyard, unlocked, for a good year or so.
3) Drugged-out jerks. Fortunately, we escaped this. But our next-door neighbors were burglarized, their house ripped up, mere days before we moved to SE.

What the Buckman neighborhood has brought us is a kind of crime that pisses me off more than any: vandalism and crimes of no use to the criminal except to make you really mad.

David parks his BMW motorcycle outside by the curb. In the first week we lived in our house, a group of punks knocked it and our neighbor’s scooter (parked next to it) over. For the hell of it, as far as we can tell. Our neighbor said she heard the crash and ran to the door to the sounds of a group of rowdy idiots laughing down the street. It did so much damage to her scooter that it’s still in the shop. David’s turn signal and windshield were both broken to the point of requiring replacement.

A few days ago, some jerk yanked on the sparkplugs of David’s motorcycle, managing to rip a wire in half that is going to cost $85 bucks to replace, not to mention the pain-in-the-ass factor. If the perpetrator had actually stolen any sparkplugs, I might assume it was a drug-paraphenalia-related crime, but they didn’t.

Now David parks his motorcycle in the garage, but really, what gene or conditioning or gender or upbringing brings out vandalism in people? What force drives this? It’s so foreign and despicable to me.

3 Responses to “On Crime”

  1. Mendingo Says:

    Bare in mind that in your previous place, a quite moronically drunk pair of idiots (myself and another of your friends) extracted a ladder from your back garden, set it up against your house at stupid o’clock at night, and with the subtlety of a chainsaw-wielding dentist, climbed in through your top-floor window.

    And not one of your neighbours battered an eyelid!

    At least in your new place, your neighbours notice when potential crimes are happening!

  2. Higgins Says:

    If you walk to work using Main Street, you’ll observe a lot of graffiti, at least between 13th and 7th (which is a sleepy warehouse district). Since I walk the same way every day, I see the lifecycle of graffiti — they tag, it gets painted over, repeat (INFINITELY). A couple of businesses stopped painting over it, and one is now literally covered in tags. Sigh.

    ;Chris

  3. mikey Says:

    Didn’t I tell you they used to do that spark plug thing to my motorcycle, in Goose Hollow? One time they cut through the cover, I swear to God, just to pull the wire off ONE sparkplug. Do you know how a 30 year old motorcycle that has FOUR cylinders runs on THREE cylinders? real fucking bad, that’s how. These crimes I, for some reason, associate with spoiled white teenagers.
    Also, to be fair, we both know there were random stupid crimes at your old place, need I mention the “car-walking?”

Leave a Reply

Smug, Self-Congratulatory Bit; Then a Minor Rant

January 17th, 2007

I have to say I feel pretty good in one regard: I believe I have walked and run more miles this month than I have driven. Granted, I’m hardly driving at all in the new house, but still. As of today I’ve walked or otherwise foot-propelled myself about 55 miles since the 1st. I’ve been keeping track. The fact that work is about .65 mile from home gives me a nearly “free” 1.3 miles per day alone.

Now my minor rant. I was out for a long walk the other day after dark and was crossing the street at a quiet, uncontrolled*, neighborhood intersection when a bicyclist came zipping up out of nowhere and took a right turn into my path. He looked back and gave me that “I’m-on-a-bike-fuck-you” glare that I just bloody hate. I understand that bicyclists are doing the right thing, saving the earth, reducing congestion, etc., etc., but aren’t I, on foot, as well? This guy totally had the attitude like I was cutting him off, even though he was turning and I was going straight. What is with certain bikers and their holier-than-thou idiocy? OK, done!

Cheerful again!

* Having grown up in PDX I had no idea that uncontrolled intersections were unusual. In our quiet neighborhood areas, it is common for an intersection not to have any traffic control–stop or yield signs, whatever. You just have to approach carefully (I believe neighborhood speed limits are usually 15MPH) and pay attention to see if anyone’s coming. This tends to freak non-Portlanders out. Do they really not have this in other cities?

4 Responses to “Smug, Self-Congratulatory Bit; Then a Minor Rant”

  1. Anonymous Says:

    There’s some of those “free-for-all” intersections in Seattle too. They never freaked me out until I was learning to drive as a teenager. Now I love the freedom/challenge of the uncontrolled intersections.

  2. coulee Says:

    It sounds as if the cyclist had the same attitude that drivers often have about cyclists: I’m bigger, you’re holding me up, so get out of my way!

  3. Anonymous Says:

    By the way, SO jealous you can walk to work. I slog 20 miles each way to the ol’ INTC.

  4. Todd Says:

    I used to live two blocks up the street from you and I have no idea where the uncontrolled intersections are. But I don’t drive a lot, either, so maybe I just never had to notice.

    And yeah, there are plenty of bike supremacists out there, and pedestrians don’t get enough respect in Portland. As one who regularly (tries to) walk the 3.7 miles to work most mornings, I’m aware of this.

    But I do my part for pedestrian elitism: every time I stand at 2nd and the western end of the Morrison Bridge, waiting to cross, I eagerly anticipate gloating (to myself) at the cars that so often run the red light there. Once, I slapped a particularly egregious transgressor’s car, as the walk sign had been green for a bit before he made it through. Then, when I thought I saw him pull over (obviously so he could conemplate killing me for touching his car), I got nervous and briskly made my way to work.

    Walking power!

Leave a Reply

Calvinism: How Did Anyone Think this was a Good Idea?

January 15th, 2007

I’ve been walking around a lot lately, and a lot of that walking around has me looking dreamy and thoughtful and that is because I’m listening to a series of 48 lectures on the history of western civilization (up to 1600) on my iPod. Lots of stuff has struck me, but today I nearly fell in front of a bus during one of the lectures on the Protestant Reformations of the 16th century. That is, when Professor Noble started talking about Calvinism, I actually said, out loud: “This is a horrible idea.” I mean, I have never seen a religious outlook that is so bleak and damning of human nature, so futile and so joyless.

The following is stolen from Wikipedia and is an outline of “TULIP” (my comments are additional), a mnemonic device used to remember Calvinism’s main tenets.

Total depravity (or total inability): As a consequence of the Fall of man, every person born into the world is enslaved to the service of sin. According to the view, people are not by nature inclined to love God with their whole heart, mind, or strength, but rather all are inclined to serve their own interests over those of their neighbor and to reject the rule of God. Thus, all people by their own faculties are morally unable to choose to follow God and be saved because they are unwilling to do so out of the necessity of their own natures. Editor’s Translation: Everyone is evil. Great.

Unconditional election: God’s choice from eternity of those whom he will bring to himself is not based on foreseen virtue, merit, or faith in those people. Rather, it is unconditionally grounded in God’s mercy. Translation: Nothing you do in your life means anything because God has already decided whether you get saved or not. So don’t bother to live a good life or help folks out because if you’re meant to go to hell, you’re screwed.

Limited atonement (or particular redemption or definite atonement): The death of Christ actually takes away the penalty of sins of those on whom God has chosen to have mercy. It is “limited” to taking away the sins of the elect, not of all humanity, and it is “definite” and “particular” because atonement is certain for those particular persons. Translation: Christ’s whole cross thing wasn’t good enough to save everyone, so God picks and chooses those folks in advance for whom it applies.

Irresistible grace (or efficacious grace): The saving grace of God is effectually applied to those whom he has determined to save (the elect) and, in God’s timing, overcomes their resistance to obeying the call of the gospel, bringing them to a saving faith in Christ. Translation: If you’re special and chosen and whatever, you’ll eventually come over to God’s side.

Perseverance of the saints (or preservation of the saints): Any person who has once been truly saved from damnation must necessarily persevere and cannot later be condemned. The word saints is used in the sense in which it is used in the Bible to refer to all who are set apart by God, not in the technical sense of one who is exceptionally holy, canonized, or in heaven (see Saint).Translation: Again, nothing you do matters. If you’re awesome and predestined to be one of the lucky guys, you’re a shoo-in.

Other neat things were that Calvin imposed this shit on the entirety of Geneva, wherein you could be arrested for not going to church or for, I dunno, enjoying life and singing or dancing. Glad I didn’t live there then. Sheesh. Fun times.

5 Responses to “Calvinism: How Did Anyone Think this was a Good Idea?”

  1. Anonymous Says:

    Unfortunately I think you will find that many of the components of TULIP are actually adopted by modern Protestants in America today, at least on the far right. Even worse, I don’t think many of them don’t realize the outcome of what it means to believe in these things.

    What’s interesting is that I’ve thought for a long time something similar to the “U” component of your acronym, not knowing that it was a tenet of Calvinism. Of course an all-knowing, all-powerful god is going to know how you will end up the moment it created you. After all, He designed and “wound up” the machine that is his universe. He would know how it ends before it begins.

    Modern protestants which dominate religion in America today have adopted the paradoxical notion of “free will” to get around this problem. But I don’t see how this concept is compatible with the all-knowing, all-powerful properties of God. In the end, no one can actually do anything that will alter the state of the “universal machine” in a way that God wouldn’t have known.

    It is definitely a bleak and depressing idea not only about human beings, but about the nature of an all knowing god. Unfortunately for many people, they believe it.

  2. Mendingo Says:

    It sounds exactly like every other religion… a reason to not feel responsible for your own actions. “If God wanted it, there’s nothing we could do” etc.

  3. White Badger Says:

    Sadly, your thoughts fall short.
    It is not a “cop-out” for our sinfulness.
    Calvinism shows us our own depravity, and then encourages us to rely on God, for He alone can supply us with grace and Salvation.
    This thought warms my heart!
    When once I was lost, now He has found me!
    When once I was blind, now I see!
    Ever noticed how everything you do seems to fall through? How all your “excuses are weak?”
    It’s true for all of us.
    In our own strength…we’ll never make it very far. Not like we should, or could, if His strength was doing all the work.
    So when I think of this encouraging doctrine, I am motivated to praise Him, to exalt His name. To proclaim His goodness to all. There is nothing which He does not design. Nothing escapes His control!

  4. Anonymous Says:

    White Badger is copping out.

    To ascribe the metaphors of strength, excuse, and will, all of which are embodied human characteristics to a supernatural being (that which can not be explained by any metaphor at all) is fundamentally contradictory.

    The weakness is not in those that choose to believe in what can be explained (and the pursuit of better explanations) but in those that choose NOT to.

    Make the hard choice and try to understand where our predispositions and metaphors come from, and then try to explain the world we live in. When you start with a religious doctrine, you close yourself to the possibility of so much more, and end up walking a bloody, futile and well-trodden path.

    S

  5. mike (yes, the one and only) Says:

    Must….resist…urge..to.comment…
    Damn..what is Badger trying to say? He’s supposed to be some kind of theology expert, yet he’s defending strict Calvinism in a modern context? Believe whatever you want, and I know Presbyterianism and other religions trace their roots back Calvin’s doctrines, but we need to separate these issues. I feel White Badger is trying to defend religion, or more specifically, Christianity. We’re talking about Calvinism, specifically, not God in general. Does he support every tenet of every religious doctrine so vigorously, or what, and this is always the question, what does he NOT believe in? None of it seems like a very elegant theory to me, if it even qualifies as a theory, since there’s no way to test it empirically.

Leave a Reply

Avoid Standard Insurance

January 10th, 2007

I hate it when I’m almost too mad to write clearly.

Basically, as far as I am concerned, Standard Insurance has stolen more than $6300 from me and refuses to give it back or give me appropriate customer service.

In late October, I initiated a rollover from my 401k at Fidelity, the provider of 401ks at my last job. Fidelity issued a check to me (their policy; they won’t directly mail a check to another provider) and I forwarded it on to Standard.

A couple of weeks later I noticed it still hadn’t posted to my account.

I called Standard and they gave me some vague blow-off about it not being received, no record of it, all while sounding annoyed at me. After this conversation, I presumed I’d screwed up the paperwork somehow and the check had been lost.

Standard advised me to wait a while and see if it surfaced.

As of last week, it still hadn’t posted and I hadn’t heard anything. I called back. They gave me the same runaround, but this time suggested I contact Fidelity and get a check re-issued, as it had been lost.

I called Fidelity (who has great customer service, so far, by the way), who said they’d love to re-issue a check, but they couldn’t, as the check they wrote in October had been cashed November 6th.

I called Standard back (this was last Thursday or so) and presented them with this information. At this point I got a little less nice. My not-niceness was very much ignored as the gentleman rushed to get me off the phone. The insinuation was still that somehow I’d done something wrong. No apologies. No explanations. Just a “we marked this as urgent” (with no sense of urgency) and “someone will call you back on Monday or Tuesday.”

It’s Wednesday. I can’t say I’m surprised no one called me yet, but I called them again this a.m. No further information (urgent my ass) and the same lackluster phone experience with the guy not particularly helpful or nice. Could I talk to the department researching this? No, apparently, he claimed they’re in the “back office” and can’t talk to people. Finally I demanded his supervisor, and ended up at voice mail. I wonder if this person will return my call.

For now, I’m sitting back, trying not to be too angry, waiting for a copy of Fidelity’s check to arrive in the mail (see–Fidelity even suggested this themselves…there is such thing as proactive customer service) and wondering if I should call a lawyer.

Thoughts?

2 Responses to “Avoid Standard Insurance”

  1. Marc Says:

    Is the only reason you are using Standard Insurance because your current employer has their 401k with them or some such, or did you actually choose them because they seemed like they offered something useful?

    If it is the former, and I know this doesn’t actually help now, but in general, I have found it is a bad idea to roll a 401k over into another 401k plan. They are generally run by companies that don’t have the best service, charge too many fees, and don’t have the best or lowest expense ratio funds; their customer isn’t primarily you, it is the company they provide 401k services to. Instead just roll it over to an IRA at the place of your choice, then when you leave your next company just roll that 401k into the same IRA, etc.

    But, at this point, you just have to be persistent probably. Make sure to try to hold each person you talk to accountable for what they are doing next. Eventually they will work it out.

  2. mikey Says:

    Of course you should call a lawyer, this follows the rule for so many things: If you are asking, “should I do X?” The answer is always yes, in my experience, I’d say an outlay of $150 or whatever to get a lawyer to write a letter is worth 6 Large of piece of mind. This is why there are so many lawyers, they come in handy.

Leave a Reply

Hang the F*** Up

January 8th, 2007

Note to daft drivers on Hwy 99E at rush hour, in the traffic, fog, damp and dark: hang the fuck up. Then you won’t almost hit me so often. I realize I’m a lowly pedestrian, but I’d like to live and not have my last image be of your distracted ass with your cell phone glued to your ear by the hand that should be, I dunno, controlling your car. That includes you, glib pixie-ish early-20-something girl in Honda Civic.

Leave a Reply