Lyza Danger Gardner

All about Lyza


Book Review: “Sarah’s Key” by Tatiana de Rosnay

May 3rd, 2008

I received another Early Reviewer book this month from LibraryThing. The paperback edition of Sarah’s Key will come out this fall. It is currently available in hardback from Amazon and other sources.

In 1942, thousands of Jewish children, women, and men were herded into a stadium in Paris–the Vel’d'Hiv’–and summarily shipped off to concentration camps, mostly to their immediate deaths. That this roundup was executed by the French police (not the Nazis) and that it was mostly expurgated from the mainstream of French history darkens an already dark chapter. “Sarah’s Key” follows the fictional story of one young victim, a 10-year-old girl, and a modern woman whose life whose life intersects with hers in mysterious ways.

The story is part mass market thriller, part didactic history lesson, and part novel, a well-crafted but poorly-written page-turner more akin to an action movie than a work of literary subtlety.

It was about a third of the way into “Sarah’s Key” that I started wondering if it had been originally written in English (t was). I scoured the title pages for translator credits; I surfed the Web for data. The author, Tatiana de Rosnay, is French, so it would be feasible that that language is where this began. I did this research because I was hoping that there was a reason that the language was as dreadful as it was. I wanted to be able to blame someone other than the author for the stock, jarring phrases like “eyes white with fear” and “speechless with terror.” At one point, speaking of a matter of life and death amongst the characters, de Rosnay has the young girl worry franctically if, by locking her very young brother in a hidden cabinet when the police come to round up her family, she has “let him down.”

Let him down? “I let him down” is a reasonable thing to say when you miss your kid get a home run in his tee-ball game because you’re working late at the office. It seems a wildly inappropriate (not to mention anachronistic) way to describe a child’s potential death. Perhaps this was on purpose. But it smacked of a carelessness with words that I found difficult to ignore.

The effort the book makes at bringing an obfuscated, shameful piece of history to the fore is noble. de Rosnay is right, most people have not heard of this tragedy. But what’s missing, except for brief mention, is the broader context of the French Occupation and the Vichy regime. France’s political paroxysms during WWII are complex, and I’m not going to pretend I understand them (yet). I would have appreciated a lesson in how the Vel d’Hiv’ tragedy plugged in to what was going on in a broader sense. de Rosnay condemns the French policemen for carrying out the grim task, and though she does have a character that breaks out his jackboot role, the rest of the force is portrayed as thugs blindly following orders. One has to question what the motivation was, what was really driving it.

What I can credit the work with is its inventiveness of plot. I hesitate to pigeonhole something about the Holocaust as a “beach read” but it has that tempo, a Dan Brown-ish Byzantine intrigue, that seems to suggest the genre. At an early point in the story, I paused and made specific predictions about the resolution of the story arcs. I was wrong about nearly all of them, which was redeeming.

During my brief Web research about the book, I came across the publisher’s page, trumpeting that movie rights have been sold. Good, I thought. Perfect. Because this is an isolated case in which I think the movie might be better than the book. ( )

Tags: , ,

Leave a Reply

Book Review: “Julius Caesar” by Shakespeare

April 17th, 2008

Forgive me that it took me eight months to finish Shakespeare’s shortest play. I kept picking it up, reading the first act, and then forgetting.

It’s strange reading about Roman history through compound filters: dramatization, Shakespearean England, what we know of the Roman Republic, modern norms. One gets so twisted around that nary an eyebrow is raised in Act 2 when Caesar asks “What is’t o’clock?” (Brutus: “Caesar, ’tis strucken eight.
“) Such a tangle that it might not jump immediately to mind that there were probably not a whole lot of chiming clocks in the first century BC. We’ve got Centurions herein acting like they’re on Queen Elizabeth’s court. Strange.

This play is brief. Brief enough that it doesn’t feel like a story so much as a string of exchanges. Brutus (who refers to himself in the third person and thus puts me in the mind of Tarzan or other deep-voiced simpleton) seems instantly swayed to subterfuge. Caesar is full of lofty exaltations but kind of amounts to nothing when you think about it. Marc Antony does show a bit of craftiness, and Cassius is devious.

I do like the way Casca responds to Cassius’ invitation to dinner and I hope I can use it myself sometime: “Ay, if I be alive, and your mind hold, and your dinner worth the eating.”

I do feel like that sometimes. ( )

Tags: ,

One Response to “Book Review: “Julius Caesar” by Shakespeare”

  1. tODD Says:

    I read this play so long ago that I have no real memory of it besides what my high school brain decided to store and the truly famous bits. But I still giggle at the following exchange:

    CINNA: I am Cinna the poet, I am Cinna the poet!
    FOURTH CITIZEN: Tear him for his bad verses, tear him for his bad verses!

Leave a Reply

Book Review: “Franklin and Lucy…” by Joseph Persico

April 10th, 2008

Franklin Delano Roosevelt is the stuff of American myth, an untouchable, shining character whose presidency consistency rates as one of the most successful in the country’s history. His remarkable policies still echo in today’s landscape, his fireside chats and chin-up optimism the fodder of memorials and nostalgic World War II veterans.

But FDR’s golden aura obfuscates the complexity of his real life, his missteps and confusions, his deceits and his pains. We see something larger than life in FDR, a giant of a soul unyielding against significant physical disability and guiding a country at a violent crossroads. But what Joseph Persico gives us in “Frankin and Lucy” is not a formal story of the presidency. It’s a messier, sometimes tragic and maddening, look at the man, and the women who shaped him.

But before bringing in the ladies, Persico must chip away at the happy lore of FDR as magnanimous hero. In his early life, see, Roosevelt is jarringly unlikeable. Persico labels him a “Little Lord Fauntleroy” type, infantile and shapeless under the weight of his overbearing mother, Sara Delano. With his English-sounding accent and exclusive private school background, his golden mane and his conflict-free childhood, FDR at first seems effete and blank.

If his early life is meaningless, FDR as Harvard brat is a more deplorable character. Seemingly unburdened by any real personality, Roosevelt spent his college years joining social clubs and tippling with chums. Flirty, shallow, dandified, brutishly unaffected by anything suggesting emotion–and prone to fabrication.

FDR lied, indeed. He lied about scooping a big story at the Harvard Crimson, which led to glory for him and the newspaper. He lied about affairs. Later, he lied about his involvement in an anti-homosexual sting operation in 1920. For pleasure he requisitioned Navy ships and sailed them to his summer getaway, mistress and entire crew in tow.

By the time Persico introduces the women who will have vast influence on the rest of FDR’s life, it’s easy to feel ambivalent about the guy. Persico is impeccably aware of this. Initially he brushes off some of FDR’s shortcomings, like his tall tales, calling them “… quintessential Roosevelt, not quite dishonest, but an improvement on the truth that he persuaded himself was fact.”

But Persico is not negligent. He knows that the questions of morality are stuck in the craw of the book for its entire length, and will eventually circle back elegantly and readdress the ethical conundrums.

Persico shows us Eleanor Roosevelt: a sad, orphaned, homely, noble, pathetic, ultimately-triumphant character who veers in and out of FDR’s inner world. We meet Lucy (though FDR doesn’t until page 83, despite her serving as the book’s namesake), and Persico can say nothing bad about her, though his descriptions of her character initially lack much dimension.

She’s good, we hear. She’s lovely and charming and keeps Roosevelt in stitches (unlike stodgy, diffident wife Eleanor). Their affair (a foregone thing from the beginning of the book) is portrayed as desperate and passion-driven, hopeless but honorable.

For readers steeped our this particular modern American culture, with monogamy and fidelity apotheosized above most any virtue, FDR’s waywardness in romance is almost painful to read. And, though it would seem that the era in which this all occurred would be the one to suck in its breath, prudishly, with shock at his dalliances, it’s the modern context in which we shake our heads sadly.

The web expands. Other women: Missy LeHand, Dorothy Schiff, Daisy Stuckley. Some stand-in secretary-wives, others touchstones of stability.

And then, after faith in his inherent decency has been wearied: we see the president pummeled on all levels by polio, storming back at it with ferocity. Here is where FDR is truly born, where the women in his life integrate influences into a bolder character for him to bring into his greatest times of public service. Suddenly, he’s someone intriguing.

The women support, type, mull over, encourage and prod the crippled Roosevelt. They love and are ignored, often. The polio gave him something abstract to beat against. A needed hurdle. Adversity and the support of those close to him gave him the personal depth to be the president we know.

Through unflinching looks at the Roosevelts’ most intimate moments, their miseries and their betrayals, Persico will make you re-evaluate the relative import of personal foibles in the face of civic duty. We are asked to separate our personal moral convictions from those relevant to the American community–a conflict that has resurfaced, repeatedly, in recent history.

What Persico does with grace is to confuse us, charging us to reconsider. No longer is it clear who is right and wrong in FDR’s inner sanctum. Adultery, love, missed connections, lost letters, loneliness. The metamorphosis of a peevish youth of questionable depth and minimal personality into the transcendent, multi-layered man of history. Aching sacrifices of truth and love. Persico gives us this complex personal journey, with redemption, in a well-crafted story of love, longing, women and the FDR we thought we knew. (

Tags: , ,

Leave a Reply

I’m a Reviewer!

March 25th, 2008

Of course I’m taking this far too seriously, but this month I made it into LibraryThing’s Early Reviewers. I get to read a pre-release biography about FDR: President Roosevelt, Mrs. Rutherfurd, and the Other Remarkable Women in his Life by Joseph Persico (forthcoming from Random House). As reading about FDR was on my goals for 2008 reading, this fits perfectly.

Tags:

Leave a Reply

Review: Jane Eyre (Penguin Classics) by Charlotte Brontë

November 28th, 2007

Jane Eyre (Penguin Classics) by Charlotte Brontë

Funny how a book written 160 years ago can be this eyebrow-raising. I actually found myself saying to myself (almost out loud): “Oh no she didn’t” and “She slept where?!” and “He said what?!” Compared to Austen (who, granted, wrote 40 years earlier), which I’ve been reading lots of lately, this is raunchy stuff.

It’s also remarkably plot-driven, much to my relief. And the plot (again to compare to Jane Austen) broaches the boundaries of mere courtships and the quotidian. A few true twists happen. There are indeed still long passages of description (enjoyable, still) and religious reflection (less enjoyable to me), but mostly, we’re talking page-turner here.

In true Victorian literature fashion, expect some improbable coincidences and melodrama. But what Brontë excels at here–I mean really excels!–is character development. Some of the dialog in Jane Eyre is so good it’s obvious that no one would ever actually SAY that, but it’s still so good. Brontë manages to make middle-aged Rochester kind of hot, and then there’s the surprisingly full-sketched figure of St. John Rivers.

All in all, I can say this wasn’t what I expected, and mostly in a good way. Having read Dickens, Thackeray (contemporaries) and Austen (earlier) this year, Brontë really stood out on her own, with a strong, engaging style. ( )

Tags: , , , , ,

Leave a Reply